Proper oil sampling is critical to an effective oil analysis program. Without a representative sample, further oil analysis endeavors are futile. There are two primary goals in obtaining a representative oil sample. The first goal is to maximize data density. The sample should be taken in a way that ensures there is as much information per milliliter of oil as possible. This information relates to such criteria as cleanliness and dryness of the oil, depletion of additives, and the presence of wear particles being generated by the machine.
The second goal is to minimize data disturbance. The sample should be extracted so that the concentration of information is uniform, consistent and representative. It is important to make sure that the sample does not become contaminated during the sampling process. This can distort and disturb the data, making it difficult to distinguish what was originally in the oil from what came into the oil during the sampling process.
To ensure good data density and minimum data disturbance in oil sampling, the sampling procedure, sampling device and sampling location should be considered. The procedure by which a sample is drawn is critical to the success of oil analysis. Sampling procedures should be documented and followed uniformly by all members of the oil analysis team. This ensures consistency in oil analysis data and helps to institutionalize oil analysis within the organization. It also provides a recipe for success to new members of the team.
The hardware used to extract the sample should not disturb sample quality. It should be easy to use, clean, rugged and cost-effective. In addition, it is important to use the correct bottle type and bottle cleanliness to assure that a representative sample is achieved.
A successful oil analysis program requires an investment of time and money to make sure the proper sampling hardware is fitted to the machinery. It is important to understand that not all locations in a machine will produce the same data. Some are far richer in information than others. In addition, some machines require multiple sampling locations to answer specific questions related to the machine’s condition, usually on an exception basis.
There are several rules for properly locating oil sampling ports on circulating systems. These rules cannot always be precisely followed because of various constraints in the machine’s design, application and plant environment. However, the rules outlined below should be followed as closely as possible:
Turbulence. The best sampling locations are highly turbulent areas where the oil is not flowing in a straight line but is turning and rolling in the pipe. Sampling valves located at right angles to the flow path in long straight sections of pipe can result in particle fly-by, which basically leads to a substantial reduction of the particle concentration entering the sample bottle. This can be avoided by locating sampling valves at elbows and sharp bends in the flow line (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Highly Turbulent Area
Ingression Points. Where possible, sampling ports should be located downstream of the components that wear, and away from areas where particles and moisture ingress. Return lines and drain lines heading back to the tank offer the most representative levels of wear debris and contaminants. Once the fluid reaches the tank, the information becomes diluted.
Filtration. Filters and separators are contaminant removers, therefore they can remove valuable data from the oil sample. Sampling valves should be located upstream of filters, separators, dehydrators and settling tanks unless the performance of the filter is being specifically evaluated.
Drain Lines. In drain lines where fluids are mixed with air, sampling valves should be located where oil will travel and collect. On horizontal piping, this will be on the underside of the pipe. Sometimes oil traps, like a goose neck, must be installed to concentrate the oil in the area of the sampling port. Circulating systems where there are specific return lines or drain lines back to a reservoir are the best choice for sampling valves (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Return or Drain Line
They allow the sample to be taken before the oil returns to the tank and always before it goes through a filter. If the oil is permitted to return to the tank, then the information in the sample becomes diluted, potentially by thousands of gallons of fluid in large lubricating and hydraulic systems. In addition, debris in the reservoir tends to accumulate over weeks and months and may not accurately represent the current condition of the machine.
When a sample is taken from a line in a circulating system it is referred to as a live zone sample. There are things that can be done during the sampling process that improve the quality and effectiveness of live zone oil sampling. These include sampling from the system’s turbulent zones where the fluid is moving and the oil is well mixed; sampling downstream of the equipment after it has completed its primary functions, such as lubricating a bearing or a gear or has passed through a hydraulic pump or actuator; sampling during typical working conditions, on the run and under normal applications; and, where required, employing secondary sampling locations to localize problems.
Just as there are factors that can improve the quality of a sample, there are also other factors that can diminish a sample’s quality and thus should be avoided. For example, it is important not to sample from dead pipe legs, hose ends and standing pipes where the fluid isn’t moving or circulating. Samples should not be collected after filters or separators or after an oil change, filter change or at some time when the fluid wouldn’t represent typical conditions. Samples should not be taken when the machine is cold and hasn’t been operating or has been idling. In addition, samples should not be taken from laminar flow zones where a lack of fluid turbulence occurs.
When samples need to be taken from pressurized feed lines leading to bearings, gears, compressors, pistons, etc., the sampling method is simpler. Figure 3 shows four different configurations.
Figure 3. Pressurized Lines
Portable High-Pressure Tap Sampling. The uppermost configuration on Figure 3 is a high-pressure zone where a ball valve or needle valve is installed and the outlet is fitted with a piece of stainless steel helical tubing. The purpose of the tubing is to reduce the pressure of the fluid to a safe level before it enters the sampling bottle. A similar effect can be achieved using a small, hand-held pressure reduction valve.
Minimess Tap Sampling. This alternative requires installation of a minimess valve, preferably on an elbow. The sampling bottle has a tube fitted with a probe protruding from its cap. The probe attaches to the minimess port allowing the oil to flow into the bottle. There is a vent hole on the cap of the sampling bottle so that when the fluid enters the bottle the air can expel or exhaust from the vent hole. This particular sampling method requires lower pressures (less than 500 psi) for safety.
Ball Valve Tap Sampling. This configuration requires the installation of a ball valve on an elbow. When sampling, the valve should be opened and adequately flushed. Extra flushing is required if the exit extension from the valve is uncapped. Once flushed, the sampling bottle’s cap is removed and a sample is collected from the flow stream before closing the valve. Care should be taken when removing the bottle cap to prevent the entry of contamination. This technique is not suitable for high- pressure applications.
Portable Minimess Tap Sampling. This option requires installing a minimess onto the female half of a standard quick-connect coupling. This assembly is portable. The male half of a quick-connect is permanently fitted to the pressure line of the machine at the desired sampling location. To sample, the portable female half of the quick-connect is screwed or snapped (depending on adapter type) onto the male piece affixed to the machine. As the adapter is threaded onto the minimess valve, a small spring loaded ball is depressed within the minimess valve allowing oil to flow through the valve and into the sample bottle. In many cases, these male quick-connect couplings are preexisting on the equipment. A helical coil or pressure reduction valve, previously described, should be used on high-pressure lines.
Occasionally a drain line, feed line or return line is not sufficiently pressurized to take a sample. In such cases, sampling requires assistance from a vacuum pump equipped with a special adapter allowing it to attach momentarily to a valve, such as a minimess valve. With the adapter threaded onto the minimess valve, fluid can be drawn by vacuum into the bottle (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Drain Line Vacuum Sampling
Frequently, there are applications where a drain line or a return line can’t be accessed or no such line exists; these are typically called wet sump systems. Examples of wet sump systems are diesel engines, circulating gearboxes and circulating compressors. In these applications, because there is no return line, fluid must be sampled from the pressurized supply line leading to the gearing and the bearings (Figure 5). The sample should be collected before the filter, if one exists.
Figure 5. Pressure or Feed Line
The best place to sample engine crankcase oil is also just before the filter. The sampling valve should be installed between the pump and filter. This sample location is highly preferred over sampling from a drain port or using a vacuum pump and tube inserted down the dipstick port. Many newer model engines come with an appropriately located sample valve right on the filter manifold.
Figure 6. Off-line Sampling
Another example of a wet sump involving circulation is shown in Figure 6 where there is a side loop that is often referred to as a kidney loop filter. This off-line circulating system provides an ideal location to install a sampling valve between the pump and filter. A ball valve or a minimess valve can be used so that the fluid under pressure flows easily into the sample bottle without disturbing the operating system or filtration system.
There are numerous examples where no forced circulation is provided and a sample must be taken from a system’s sump or casing. This often must be done with “in-service” equipment on the run. Ring or collar bath-lubricated bearings and splash-lubricated gearboxes are common examples of these systems. All of these situations increase the challenge of obtaining a representative sample.
The most basic method for sampling such sumps is to remove the drain plug from the bottom of the sump allowing fluid to flow into the sample bottle. For many reasons, this is not an ideal sampling method or location. Most important is the fact that bottom sediment, debris and particles (including water) enter the bottle in concentrations that are not representative of what is experienced near or around where the oil lubricates the machine. The drain plug sampling method should be avoided if at all possible.
Drain port sampling can be greatly improved by using a short length of tubing, extending inward and up into the active moving zone of the sump. This ball valve and tube assembly shown in Figure 7 can, in many cases, be threaded into the drain port and can be easily removed to facilitate draining the oil. Ideally, the tip of the tube, where the oil sample is taken should be half way up the oil level, two inches in from the walls and at least two inches from the rotating elements within the sump.
Figure 7. Drain Port Tap Sampling
A third option is called drain port vacuum sampling. With this method a minimess valve is installed as previously described, but instead of fluid passing into a sample bottle by gravity, it is assisted by a vacuum sampler. This is particularly helpful where the oil is viscous and difficult to sample through a narrow tube.
Still another method for sampling a gearbox or bearing housing is to use a portable oil circulating system such as a filter cart. In this case, the filter cart is attached to the sump (Figure 8).
Figure 8. Portable Off-line Sampling
Here the cart circulates the fluid off the bottom of the sump and back into the sump. To keep from cleaning the oil before sampling, the filters must be by-passed using a directional valve. The fluid should become homogenous when it is circulated for about 5 to 15 minutes, depending on the size of the unit, the amount of fluid in the unit, and the flow rate of the filter cart. Once sufficient mixing has occurred, a sample can be taken from the sampling valve (installed between the pump and the filter).
One of the most common methods for sampling a bath- or splash-lubricated wet sump is to use the drop-tube vacuum sample method. A tube is inserted through a fill port or dip stick port and lowered into the sump cavity, usually about midway into the oil level. This sampling method has a number of drawbacks and should be avoided if the sampling methods previously described can be used instead.
Some of the primary risks and problems associated with drop-tube vacuum sampling are:
Tube Location. A tube that is directed into the fill or dipstick port is extremely difficult to control. The tube’s final resting place is hard to predict, resulting in samples being taken from different locations each time. There is also a risk of the tube actually going all the way to the bottom of the sump where debris and sediment are picked up.
Drop Tube Contamination. There is considerable concern that when the tube is being inserted into the sump it will scoop up debris from the sides of the casing. Also, the tube itself may be contaminated due to poor cleanliness control when it was produced or while it was stored.
Large Flush Volume. The drop-tube method substantially increases the volume of fluid that must be flushed to obtain a representative sample. For some small sump systems this practically results in an oil change. In addition, if the removed volume of fluid is not replaced, the machine might be restarted with inadequate lubricant volume.
Particle Fallout. For most systems, a shutdown is required to deploy the drop-tube method. This means that production must be disturbed for the sake of oil sampling, or sampling frequency must suffer because of production priorities. Neither situation is ideal. Futhermore, particles begin to settle and stratify according to size and density immediately upon shutdown, compromising the quality of oil analysis.
Machine Intrusion. The drop-tube method is intrusive. The machine must be entered to draw a sample. This intrusion introduces the risk of contamination, and there is always the concern that the machine might not be properly restored to run-ready condition before startup. Whenever drop-tube sampling is used, it should be considered a sampling method of last resort. However, there are situations where no other practical method of sampling is available. In situations where drop-tube vacuum sampling must be used on circulating systems, the best sampling location is between the return line and the suction line (Figure 9). This is known as the short circuit.
Figure 9. Drop-tube Vacuum Sampling
An important factor in obtaining a representative sample is to make sure the sampling hardware is completely flushed prior to obtaining the sample. This is usually accomplished using a spare bottle to catch the purged fluid. It is important to flush five to 10 times the dead space volume before obtaining the sample. All hardware in which the oil comes into contact is considered dead space and must be flushed, including:
There is an assortment of sampling bottles that are commonly used in oil analysis. An appropriate bottle needs to be selected for the application and the test that is planned. Several features including size, material and cleanliness must be considered when selecting a sample bottle.
A number of different-sized sampling bottles are available. They vary from 50 mL (or about two ounces of fluid) to a more common 100 to 120 mL bottle. The larger bottle is preferred when tests such as particle count and viscosity analysis are required. Where a considerable number of different tests are required, a 200 ml bottle (or two 100 ml bottles) may be required. It is important to coordinate with the laboratory to select the bottle size that will provide a sufficient volume to conduct all the required tests and leave some extra for storage in case a rerun is necessary.
Another consideration in selecting the bottle size is that the entire volume of the bottle should not be filled with fluid during the sampling process. Only a portion of the sampling bottle should be filled. The unfilled portion, called the ullage, is needed to allow proper fluid agitation by the laboratory to restore even distribution of suspended particles and water in the sample. The general guidelines for filling bottles are:
Bottles are available in several materials. Plastic polyethylene is one of the most common bottle materials. It is an opaque material similar to a plastic milk jug. This type of sampling bottle presents a drawback because the oil can’t be visually examined after the sample is obtained. Important oil properties, such as sediment, darkness, brightness, clarity and color, can be immediately learned from a visual inspection.
Another material is PET plastic. It is a completely clear, glass-like material and is available in standard-sized bottles. This plastic is found to be compatible with most types of lubricating oils and hydraulic fluids, including synthetics.
Of course, glass bottles are also available. These bottles tend to be more expensive, are heavier, and there is the risk of breakage during the sampling process. One advantage with glass bottles is that they can be cleaned and used over and over. The cleanliness of glass bottles often exceeds that of plastic bottles.
One of the most important considerations in selecting a sampling bottle is to make sure it is sufficiently clean. The bottle’s required cleanliness level should be determined in advance. (See the article titled “Bottle Cleanliness: Is a New Standard Needed?” in the March-April 2003 issue of Practicing Oil Analysis magazine for additional information on sample bottle cleanliness.)
All oil analysis tools, techniques and diagnostic processes are worthless if the oil sample fails to effectively represent the actual condition of the oil in service in the machine. Proper sampling procedures are the foundation of an effective oil analysis program. Without good sampling procedures, time and money are wasted, and incorrect conclusions based upon faulty data could be reached. To ensure that an oil analysis program is perceived as valuable and to boost confidence in the program, it is important to determine, understand and practice the processes that are necessary to obtain a representative oil sample.
This article is an abridged version of Chapter 4 from Oil Analysis Basics written by Drew Troyer and Jim Fitch and published by Noria Corporation. More information about the book can be obtained by visiting Noria Corporation’s online store.
Important Tips for Effective Oil Sampling
To achieve bull’s-eye oil analysis data, where oil sampling and analysis produce the most representative and trendable information, follow these basic sampling tactics:
1) Machines should be running in application during sampling. That means samples should be collected when machines are at normal operating temperatures, loads, pressures and speeds on a typical day. If that is achieved, the data will be typical as well, which is exactly what is desired.
2) Always sample upstream of filters and downstream of machine components such as bearings, gears, pistons, cams, etc. This will ensure the data is rich in information. It also ensures that no data (such as particles) is being removed by filters or separators.
3) Create specific written procedures for each system sampled. This ensures that each sample is extracted in a consistent manner. Written procedures also help new team members quickly learn the program.
4) Ensure that sampling valves and sampling devices are thoroughly flushed prior to taking the sample. Vacuum samplers and probe-on samplers should be flushed too, and if there are any questions about the cleanliness of the bottle itself, it should also be flushed.
5) Make sure that samples are taken at proper frequencies and that the frequency is sufficient to identify common and important problems. Record the hours on the oil where possible, especially with crankcase and drive train samples. This can be a meter reading or some other record identifying the amount of time that the oil has been in the machine. If there has been any makeup fluid added or any change to the oil such as the addition of additives, a partial drain or anything similar, communicate this information to the lab.
6) Forward samples immediately to the oil analysis lab after sampling. The properties of the oil in the bottle and the oil in the machine begin to drift apart the moment after the sample is drawn. Quickly analyzing the sample ensures the highest quality and timely decisions.
Corn Milling Plant Learns the Value of Proper Sampling
Under the guidance of Jim Smith of Allied Services Group, a corn milling plant in the southern United States started an oil analysis program in the fall of 2003. With a predominance of conveyors and other milling equipment, a significant number of the plant’s critical assets are large splash-lubricated gearboxes.
In early fall, all the plant’s critical gearboxes were sampled. Because the equipment was not equipped for best practice oil sampling - though a sampling point survey was planned - there was no choice but to use the drop tube method to obtain the samples. Even though plant personnel understood this was not the best method for sampling, with no other option, they decided a baseline sample before making any changes was warranted.
Fairly aggressive cleanliness targets of 18/16/13 for major gearboxes were set. Based on these targets, 28 samples from these gearboxes were returned as “critical” due in every case to high particle counts.
Immediately after the first baseline samples were taken, a sample point survey was conducted. Shortly thereafter, the report’s recommendation of installing pitot tube style sample valves in all of the plant’s splash-lubricated gearboxes was implemented, in conjunction with a filtration program.
At the prescribed time, these gearboxes were resampled, using the new sample valves, and submitted to the lab for analysis. Of the 28 boxes deemed initially to be “critical,” 22 of 28 were returned as “normal.”
The moral of this story is that if you want to get accurate data, particularly where particle counting is a required test, the use of appropriate sample valves is of paramount importance. To receive and act on an analysis report that indicates a “critical problem” but turns out to be nothing more than poor sampling, is the easiest way to erode confidence in any oil analysis program.