- Training & Events
- Buyer's Guide
Varnish formation has been regarded as a costly and dangerous problem for industrial lubricants in various industries such as power generation, injection molding, petrochemical, pulp and paper, and marine applications. So, what remedies are available when your system fluids are found to have high varnish potential or show signs of varnish insolubles? This buyers guide provides basic information on the varnish formation process as well as the associated tests to detect and measure problem severity. It also provides a summary of different varnish removal technologies available in today's market.
Process of Varnish Formation
Oxidation of in-service oil is often the root cause of varnish formation - the process where the oil and its additive package react with oxygen. Products of these reactions include the breakdown of base oil, additive molecules and energetic free radicals, which all act as precursors to varnish formation. During its service life, the natural occurrence of high levels of heat and hot spots in the operating systems can degrade and promote oxidation in lubricating oil. Fragments of oxidation products can form deposits leading to a sticky insoluble film which causes the aforementioned problems. Some of the principal factors that contribute to varnish formation include heat, entrained air, incompatible gases, moisture, internal or external contamination, process constituents, radiation and inadvertent mixing of a different fluid. Continued exposure to air, moisture and high operating temperature accelerates the lubricant's degradation process.
Analytical Methods to Identify Varnish in In-service Lubricants
Control of varnish and sludge can be viewed on two fronts. The first is controlling the root cause leading to the formation of VPI. Such root causes include additive dropout, bulk oil oxidation, microdieseling and electrostatic discharge. Because many of the root causes are not easily controlled, the second approach has been to treat the symptom by removing VPI from the oil before they agglomerate into sludge or condense into varnish.
To identify the problem and ultimately the root cause, it is important to employ a wide range of condition monitoring analytical methods to routinely assess the health of the fluid and machine. Among these methods are the quantitative spectrophotometric analysis (QSA) and the ultracentrifuge (UC) tests. To learn more about the full range of tests for varnish potential, the article published in Practicing Oil Analysis (May 2006) entitled "Sludge and Varnish in Turbine Systems" can serve as an excellent reference.QSA
The QSA purposely isolates and measures the specific lubricant degradation by-products that are responsible for the formation of varnish. The process begins by a 72-hour room-temperature aging process to enable insolubles and some soluble impurities to agglomerate; therefore they can be separated by filtration. Next, the sample is mixed with a petroleum-ether to isolate and agglomerate insoluble by-product material (including submicron species). Then, using a 0.45-micron membrane, a separation process extracts the varnish-forming insoluble degradation by-products (soft contaminants) and concludes with a quantitative measurement of the isolated contaminant. The concentration of the contaminant correlates directly to the varnish potential of the fluid. A rating of one to 100 indicates the propensity of the lubricant to form sludge and varnish.QSA vs. Ultracentrifuge
While the QSA method appears to be able to characterize a higher percentage of the total soft impurities in the oil (including quasi-soluble oxides), the UC targets only the insoluble fraction that can be separated in a laboratory centrifuge. Used together, this could serve as a synergistic advantage.
Because of these differences, it is possible for an oil to have a relatively high QSA value and a low UC value. In this example, the high QSA value would correspond to the quasi-insolubles fraction that is immeasurable by the centrifugation. It could be said that the analytical difference between the QSA and the UC may represent the incipient portion of varnish potential where the UC alone represents the active presence of varnish potential insolubles (VPI).
Varnish Removal Technologies
Several filtration and separation technologies are currently on the market that can intervene with the formation of varnish. By continuous removal of harmful degradation by-products, the concentration of these varnish precursors is reduced, thus providing cleaner working oil. Two means of removing varnish insolubles are available: one employs the use of various filtration media to adsorb or filter the undesired particles in the oil, while the other makes use of the charged or polar nature of target contaminants and electrostatically separates them from the oil.Balance Charge Agglomeration
Because of its chemical structure, varnish molecules are believed to be attracted to the adsorbent through weak molecular forces such as van der Waals (or dispersion) and hydrogen bonding.
To evaluate the various vendor options, many issues should be considered:
The number of installed users of the technology and the ability to contact these users as referenced.
Industry/application specialty - Do they work only with turbine oils or do they also have performance credentials with hydraulic fluids, compressor oils, gear oils, etc?
What range of geography do they service for rental equipment and support?
Flow rate capabilities - While the VPI capture efficiency is important, an equally important feature is flow rate.
The type and cost of filter elements used to remove the VPI (after agglomeration in the case of CPS technology).
Laboratory and bench testing capabilities - Many of these companies will accept samples of test fluid possessing high varnish potential values to run in the laboratory to evaluate how well the technology can reclaim the fluid after a certain number of passes.
In summary, identifying the best technology and vendor for any given oil reclamation application is no easy task. Considerable judgment must be applied after researching all aspects of the project needs and the vendor capabilities.References
Buddy Atherton. "Discovering the Root Cause of Varnish Formation." Practicing Oil Analysis magazine, March 2007.
Michael Barrett. "Varnish Potential Analysis." Practicing Oil Analysis, May 2007.
Greg Livingston, Brian Thompson and Dave Wooton. "Determining the Root Causes of Fluid Degradation." Practicing Oil Analysis, January 2007.
Jim Fitch and Sabrin Gebarin. "Sludge and Varnish in Turbine Systems." Practicing Oil Analysis, May 2006.
Buddy Atherton. "Electrostatic Particle Removal Technology."
Akira Sasaki and Shinji Uchiyama. "A New Technology for Oil Management: Electrostatic Oil Cleaner." National Fluid Power Association and Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 2002.
Kent S. Knaebel. "Adsorption and Filtration with Cellulose Media." Adsorption Research, Inc. March 2006.