- All Topics
- Training & Events
- Buyer's Guide
Regulatory responsibilities, consumer awareness and a focus on public health are challenging food and beverage processors to choose the right food-grade lubricant for every application in their processes. Here’s what you need to know.
Consumers report a “bad taste” or a “smell like tar.” Some say they had an upset stomach or a burning sensation in the throat. The culprit? Lubricants. During the last 25 years, contamination stemming from machinery lubricants in food and beverage manufacturing has resulted in lost consumer confidence and recalls, not to mention threats to public health. Without the use of appropriate food-grade lubricants and standard operating procedures (SOPs), any food and beverage manufacturer can be vulnerable to contamination.
Despite contamination risks, research shows that about 60% of U.S.-based food and beverage manufacturers have not switched from conventional oils and greases to food-grade lubricants. Many still use oils that elevate the risk potential for contamination that could essentially shut down an operation. With the adoption of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) in 2011, manufacturers creating food, pharmaceuticals and dietary supplements must implement systems and controls to address hazards. This includes assuring that lubricants are food-safe.
So, what exactly are food-grade lubricants, and how can a food and beverage manufacturer achieve compliance? What essential training and maintenance programs should be put in place to prevent contamination? This article will explore these food-grade lubricant basics and more.
Before diving into the types of lubricants commonly used in food manufacturing, new responsibilities due to regulations and how to effectively implement a safe and healthy program, let’s address why the food manufacturing industry is under pressure to adopt stringent best practices related to lubrication. The United States government agencies involved in food processing are the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Before 1998, all food-grade lubricant oversight and formulation review were the responsibility of the USDA. Lubricant manufacturers were required to prove that their formulas complied with a series of guidelines referred to as Title 21 under the Security Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
Then, the USDA put the responsibility on manufacturers to assess risk following a shift in its program in February 1998. This meant lubrication manufacturers were charged with assuring their lubricant ingredients were safe. Because of the weighty responsibility, this major program change resulted in third-party consultants and vendors entering the market to help manufacturers develop systems, identify risks and create SOPs so they could receive lubrication certification.
Today, the NSF oversees a food lubrication evaluation program. It’s basically what the USDA designed, which requires manufacturers producing lubrication for food processing applications to deliver supporting documents that prove health and safety compliance.
What does this mean for lubricant manufacturers and operations that use food-grade lubricants? Essentially, there are layers of compliance, required systems and sets of checks and balances that must be adhered to for the sake of public health.
Lubricants used in food and beverage processing are rated based on how safe they are if they come in contact with food. The National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) oversees a lubricant evaluation program that includes a list of approved lubricants.
Based on NSF ratings, an H1 lubricant can be used in food processing areas and is safe for incidental food contact. H2 lubricants can be used in food processing areas but must not be in contact with food. H3 lubricants can be used in contact with food, but are limited by FDA regulations. HT1 lubricants are heat transfer oils and also may be used in situations where incidental food contact could occur. The NSF offers a list of additional food-safe solvents and degreasing agents and constantly updates its product list.
To help guide food and beverage manufacturers in selecting the right food-safe lubricant for every application, these are the NSF lubrication basics to understand.
These food-grade lubricants can be used in food and beverage processing when there is a potential for incidental contact. These lubricants can contain basestocks, additives and thickeners. H1 lubricants can be petroleum-based or synthetic. Petroleum-based lubricants used in food and beverage manufacturing include white mineral or USP-type white mineral oils that are refined, colorless, tasteless, odorless and will not stain.
Synthetic food-safe lubricants include: basestocks like polyalphaolefins and polyalkylene glycols and silicons like dimethylpolysiloxane.
H2 lubricants can be used in food and beverage manufacturing facilities but not in applications where contact with food is a possibility. There is no defined list of ingredients that H2 lubricants must contain, but there are ingredients that cannot be present in food processing areas: carcinogens, mutagens, teratogens, mineral acids and heavy metals like arsenic, lead, mercury and others.
These are edible or soluble oils generally used for cleaning and preventing rust on machine parts. They are composed of oils from corn, cottonseed, soybean or minerals.
The FDA specifies the components that food-grade lubricants must be made of to safely have incidental contact with food. Lubricants that are NSF-certified as food-grade and achieve the FDA’s zero-tolerance standard are listed as an NSF H2 certified non-food compound.
Food-grade lubricants are safe for use in meat, poultry, and other food processing equipment and applications.
The FDA Codes in Title 21 explain what ingredients are allowed in food-safe lubricants. For example, H1s are more limited because they are allowed for incidental exposure with foods. H2 guidelines are less restrictive and include a broader selection of lubricants, yet they still meet governing guidelines and require manufacturers to have compliance protocols in place, as with any lubricant.
Food-grade lubricants are odorless, tasteless, and rated safe for incidental exposure. Also, food-grade lubricants can withstand extreme cold and hot temperatures. They are more stable than traditional mineral and white oil-based food-grade lubricants. Aside from complying with stringent regulatory standards, food-grade lubricants also have been shown to extend equipment life and reduce maintenance costs.
There are many moving parts in food and beverage processing equipment. The lubricants used to grease bearings, chains, gearboxes and other machine components can potentially drip, leak, mist or otherwise “touch” a product that consumers will eventually eat or drink. Every step of the production process can include some potential hazard. Identifying those potential hazards is the first step to putting controls to reduce risk exposure in place.
Food and beverage manufacturers have a responsibility to ensure safe, reliable manufacturing - and this accountability is mandated by the FSMA. SOPs must be in place to ensure FSMA compliance, guided by Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Prevention Controls (HARPC).
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 48 million people in the United States get sick - that’s 1 in 6 - and 128,000 are hospitalized. More than 3,000 die each year from foodborne diseases. The FSMA shifted “response” and reactive measures to a proactive, preventive approach.
FSMA is designed to dramatically change the way we identify and prevent foodborne illness in the global food system. It acknowledges foodborne illness as a significant threat to public health and the economy. It also emphasizes that food safety is a shared responsibility, and every player in the supply chain must be held accountable by putting defined protocols and procedures in place to prevent contamination.
The FSMA gives the FDA enforcement authority to promote compliance and encourage risk-based food safety standards. That way, when an exposure occurs, there are plans for a timely and effective response to help contain the problem.
There is quite a bit of confusion surrounding FSMA and hazard systems such as HACCP, and misunderstandings about what the regulations require can put a food and beverage manufacturer at risk of noncompliance. “Not understanding” FSMA will not excuse a processor from audits, fines and penalties. Because FSMA covers a broad scope of industries and manufacturers, some that might not think their facilities require food-safe lubricants could unknowingly be violating the law.
Here are some FSMA requirements and steps that will help manufacturers comply:
HACCP is a system to help stop hazards in food production, and it includes seven principles:
HARPC is a hazard analysis provision of the FSMA that was created to identify potential risks of contamination to food and ingredients in processing, manufacturing, packaging and holding. Every hazard must be identified, evaluated, prevented, monitored and corrected.
Because of the HACCP and HARPC responsibilities that are necessary for complying with FSMA, food and beverage manufacturers shoulder a significant burden to develop airtight SOPs. Basically, there is zero tolerance for contamination.
What does all this have to do with food-grade lubricants? The right lubricant must be assigned to each application in the manufacturing process, and those food-safe lubricants must stand up to FSMA requirements. Otherwise, a manufacturer is at a significant risk of threatening public health, losing consumer confidence and footing costs of recall and notification that could inhibit the ability to operate.
Unlike other industries, the food and beverage processing industry faces unique circumstances that can pose hazards to food safety when it comes to lubrication. Lubricants must stand up to extreme conditions - heat, cold, water and steam, to name a few.
Machine parts - For one, there’s the complexity of manufacturing equipment involved in the process that includes a range of components that require lubrication - pumps, mixers, tanks, chain drives, conveyor belts and more.
Internal surfaces - Beyond lubricating critical machine parts, food and beverage processors also use lubricants for internal surfaces to control factors like heat and corrosion.
Other lubricant qualities - In a food and beverage processing facility, lubricants must perform effectively by offering effective pumpability. Plus, the lubricants should stand up when exposed to water, oxygen and heat.
Selecting the right food-grade lubricants and putting required hazard prevention and SOPs in place will prevent potential risks and exposures. And, in today’s environment, no food processor can afford to take short-cuts with training and process implementation.
To develop a program in keeping with FSMA standards that will reduce liability and help protect public health, there are several factors to consider:
In pursuit of zero accidents, zero defects and zero failures, the Japanese Institute of Plant Maintenance (JIPM) developed its Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) concept. Because lubrication is critical to ensuring safe, effective food and beverage production, TPM is an effective strategy for covering all the bases of plant management to reduce risk. A plan should address HACCP, and all employees should understand processes.
While developing a training and staying compliant with FSMA might seem overwhelming, it begins by listing every step in the manufacturing process. Assemble the team, refer to a plant diagram, outline every step in the production process, and then break down those steps into machines and specific components that require lubrication.
While doing so, keep in mind what “hazard” means in the food processing arena as it relates to food-grade lubricants. Any situation that could compromise the integrity of a food product or ingredient is considered a potential hazard. By including a range of individuals involved in manufacturing processes, more intelligence about potential hazards can be compiled and reviewed.
Identifying potential risks is the foundation of establishing SOPs and training.
Below are additional tips for creating procedures to ensure lubricants are used properly, safely and in compliance with FSMA and FDA requirements.
Food and beverage processors are not alone in their pursuit to achieve FSMA compliance, properly select lubricants, and develop maintenance plans. From learning precision lubrication skills to maximize machine reliability to analyzing lubricants for use in food processing, an experienced training partner can lift the burden so manufacturers can focus on production and profitability. Noria offers a Food Processing Equipment Lubrication course that outlines the FSMA, how it impacts food processors’ lubrication program and lubricants used, and how to develop a risk-based prevention control plan that will ensure compliance.