- All Topics
- Training & Events
- Buyer's Guide
Varnish has emerged as one of the deadliest of oil contaminants in industry. Just like heat, particle and moisture contamination, varnish acts as a so-called soft contaminant that severely impacts lubrication and machine reliability.
A major issue is that varnish is known to be smaller than the size ratings of most filters and, therefore, cannot be removed using conventional pore-size related filtration. This article focuses on adsorption - a practical, simple and relatively low-cost solution to varnish removal.
Adsorption is the adhesion of molecules to a solid surface. Adsorptive filtration is the retention of particles to a filter medium by electrostatic forces or by molecular attraction.
For better understanding, it is helpful to address four common myths related to varnish removal.Myth No. 1
Myth No. 2
Varnish removal systems directly clean varnish deposits from machine surfaces.
A varnish removal system can remove only soluble and insoluble particles that pass through it. It is the ultra-clean oil circulating through the machine that removes varnish deposits. These deposits are lifted by the solvent action of the oil and then transported via the oil to the filter system for ultimate removal and collection.
Myth No. 3
The size of a varnish removal system does not matter.
When it comes to varnish removal, size truly does matter. Each varnish molecule occupies a certain amount of surface area. Thus, a removal system should have a high specific surface area to accommodate the varnish that has been removed.
Size is also a factor in terms of pump flow. The rated gpm of the varnish removal system plays a large role in the removal speed of varnish deposits. A higher turnover rate of oil in the machine will enable the purification process to stay ahead of varnish production rate. The cleaning process of varnish deposits is likewise accelerated by a higher flow rate, allowing more oil solvency to take effect.Myth No. 4
A major distinction between classical adsorption and filtration systems, as a process element, is that the performance of adsorbers typically depends strongly on temperature, flow rate, concentration and other operating conditions, while filters are less sensitive to such conditions.
It is clear how employing adsorption as a capture mechanism in combination with filtration could be a promising way to remove varnish particles. The key is finding a filter medium that also functions as an effective adsorbent.
Therefore, it is necessary to understand the fundamental physical and/or chemical forces that cause binding of molecules or particles to the adsorbent filter media.
Some high-quality oil filters utilize cellulose which can be used as an adsorbent. It has a high surface area and, due to its chemical nature, the fibers are highly suited to pick up oxygenated organic molecules such as varnish.Adsorption Compared to Electrostatic Separation
Two common methods of varnish removal are electrostatic separation and adsorption. How does adsorption compare to electrostatic separation?Electrostatic Separation
High purchase cost and operational costs
Low varnish holding capacity of collection media
Efficiency drops with the presence of water in the oil (500 ppm or greater)
Low flow rates
Complex control systems
However, removing varnish particles requires other forces besides ordinary physical forces employed in particle and moisture removal (impaction, absorption, etc.).Beyond the Classic Filters
To keep exposed metal free from such deposits, varnish and similar contaminants must be removed by filtration that goes beyond the classic filters. Adsorption is one means for accomplishing this goal because it provides a powerful and effective means to remove varnish.
Cellulose is particularly effective in this regard; its high polarity is well-suited to attracting and removing varnish. The adsorption characteristics of cellulose are inherent. Therefore, unlike electrostatic separators, no voltage or control systems are required. Capacity is determined solely by surface area. Just one gram of cellulose has a surface area of approximately 4,000 ft2. A standard filter cartridge contains 3,600 grams of cellulose, producing a staggering total surface area equal to 300 football fields.
To appreciate the impact of adsorption, one must understand the principles of classical filtration, the characteristics of varnishes and other contaminants and the basic ideas that govern adsorption. These explain how and why cellulose, in particular, is a superior means for removing varnishes from contaminated oil.
Adsorption and filtration are fundamentally different. The former relies on a range of forces that require physical chemistry to understand while the latter typically relies on simple physical forces, and captures particles by impaction or sieving. By combining adsorption and filtration, it is possible to attain high efficiency of varnish removal with a relatively simple, inexpensive and compact device.
Physisorption depends on weak physical attraction of the solid phase (adsorbent filter material) for components in the fluid phase (varnish molecules). It is characterized by the fact that physisorption is: (a) sensitive to temperature, (b) relatively nonspecific among constituents in the fluid phase, (c) relatively fast because there is no significant activation barrier, (d) possibly occurs in multiple layers on the solid surface, and (f) the magnitude of the heat of adsorption is relatively small.
Conversely, chemisorption occurs by chemical bonding via electron transfer. It is characterized by the fact that it is: (a) specific, (b) relatively slow due to the existence of an activation barrier (with associated chemical kinetics), (c) exhibits monolayer formation on the solid surface, and (d) the magnitude of the heat of adsorption is relatively large.
Though certain aspects of lubricant filtration imply that the uptake of varnish particles might involve chemisorption, it is more likely that physisorption governs their uptake. Thus, the remainder of this section is devoted mostly to that topic.
The forces of physisorption fall into two main categories: van der Waals (or dispersion) forces and electrostatic forces.
Van der Waals forces are weak molecule-to-molecule forces that cause a small particle to adhere to a surface, for example, as dust sticks to eye glasses. Electrostatic forces can be subdivided into polarization forces, field-dipole interactions, and field gradient-quadrupole interactions. These forces occur only if the surface is polar and are represented by a Coulombic potential function.
The last type of electrostatic effect is called hydrogen bonding. It is a specific form of electronic interaction which is important for polar, partially oxidized molecules, such as varnishes and surfaces, such as cellulose. On account of the generic chemical structures for varnish identified earlier, it is likely that hydrogen bonding is important for removing varnishes from lubricants.
In summary, adsorption of varnishes from oil likely occurs mostly by physisorption instead of chemisorption. The phenomena that contribute to physisorption are van der Waals (or dispersion) forces and electrostatic forces. Of these, van der Waals forces depend on the polarizability of the varnish molecules.
Electrostatic forces that are important for varnish in contact with cellulose include polarization forces, field-dipole interactions, and especially hydrogen bonding. While these provide a means for understanding the interactions and might someday be a basis for computer simulations, today we are limited to using our understanding merely as a basis for choosing materials and subsequently performing empirical analysis.
In order to adsorb varnish molecules (or particles), they must be brought into contact with the adsorbent surface. That sounds simple, but there are some complications. Most importantly, there is resistance to motion from the oil to the adsorbent surface. The rate of uptake, or the adsorption kinetics, depends on that resistance. In addition, instead of being a single resistance, it is a combination of resistances.
To illustrate visually, Figures 1 and 2 show a before and after rendition of a loose bundle of cellulose fibers (pale yellow) in the midst of oil containing varnish particles (gold). Figure 1 shows the contaminated oil approaching the fibers early in the life of the filter. Figure 2 shows the nearly loaded filter still producing clean oil, at some later time, having nearly exhausted the adsorbent. One of the features is that the varnish particles shown are too small to be captured by physical forces such as impaction or sieving, but rather are captured by adsorption, due to the molecular forces mentioned earlier.
What happens inside the fiber can be viewed according to Figures 3 and 4, which show a cross-section of a typical fiber, comprised of dozens or hundreds of cellulose molecules, shown as smaller not-quite-circular sections. The space between those molecules inside the fiber is shown in pink, but it is intended to be open space. To the extent there is binder, it may, of course, penetrate the space, but a skin is shown, along with a fictitious film (blue).
Figure 3. Overview
Let's consider what happens to the varnish molecules (or particles). First, there is the transport from the oil to the boundary of the adsorbent (for example, a bundle of fibers). This is frequently referred to as film diffusion because the resistance is pictured as a fictitious stagnant film. Second, there is diffusion within the adsorbent (sometimes referred to as macropore diffusion).
Figure 4. Inside the Filter Media
This could be viewed as among or between fibers. Finally, there is diffusion from the pore fluid to the adsorption sites at the adsorbent surface (sometimes referred to as micropore diffusion). This could be viewed as among the molecules. All of these depend on geometry, temperature, fluid properties, etc.